Discussion about this post

User's avatar
André Darmanin's avatar

The data here is genuinely striking and that's part of what makes the framing feel like a missed opportunity. A 43.6% drop in road fatalities and a tripling of bike-share ridership in three years would be a compelling story for a city planner, a public health official, or a municipal finance director who has never once thought about cycling advocacy. The procurement model for RideMovi alone — public investment, competitive tender, capped tariffs — is an argument worth making in its own right.

The taxi driver's court challenge is the most politically revealing moment in the piece, and it passes almost without comment. One legal filing temporarily suspended two years of measurable public benefit. That's the whole tension that exists. Who does the urban space belong to, and what institutional arrangements are durable enough to hold that answer?

Bologna has clearly built something worth examining beyond the cycling tracks. I'm curious whether you see a broader audience for this story, or whether that's your deliberate choice?

DrQasba's avatar

Rewriting a new chapter in non motorised transit, sports and well-being.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?